Legal Opinion

Specialty Oil Tool Co. v. Ames.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1931No. Docket No. 585PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Petition for a writ of mandate to require respondent to certify to the correctness of a certain transcript of proceedings had in an action in which this petitioner was defendant and -one Roy H. Moore was plaintiff. It appears from the petition that in the action of Moore v. Specialty Oil Tool Co., a Corporation, tried in the superior court, judgment was rendered against the defendant, this petitioner; that petitioner, desiring to appeal from the judgment thus rendered, proceeded under the so-called alternative method, and in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. ConreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. Specialty Oil Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Davis v. AliotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API