Legal Opinion

Laumann v. Conner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1936No. Civ. 10057PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The two above-entitled cases were consolidated for trial in the superior court and the appeal herein attacks the validity of an order granting a motion for a new trial, which order culminated the following series of events: At the conclusion of the testimony for the plaintiffs, defendant made a motion for a nonsuit on the grounds: First, that neither of the complaints constituted a cause of action; and, second, that the evidence was insufficient to support a judgment for the plaintiffs, which motion was granted on the first ground and denied as to the second.

Plaintiffs filed a notice of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Phillips v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Power v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Moore v. Specialty Oil Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Telefilm, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Gosnell v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API