Legal Opinion

Lock Joint Pipe Co. v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 8, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This is a petition to obtain the benefit of security given under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 30, § 39, as appearing in St. 1935, c. 472, § 1. Under date of November 9, 1949, the respondent Demos Brothers General Contractors, Incorporated, hereinafter called Demos, entered into a contract with the Commonwealth, acting through the metropolitan district commission, for the installation of a pipe fine for the Hyde Park pumping station. Pursuant to c. 30, § 39, a bond was executed by Demos as principal and the respondent Peerless Casualty Company, hereinafter called Peerless, as surety. The bond, in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barlow Manufacturing Co. v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Cook Borden & Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. ChaplinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Mario Pandolf Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Kennebec Framing Co. v. PickeringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Dole CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  2. AMERICAN AIR FILTER CO. INC. v. Innamorati Bros. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. WARREN BROTHERS ROADS CO. v. Joseph Rugo, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. International Heating & Air Conditioning Corp. v. Rich Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Mosaic Tile Co. v. Rusco Products of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API