Cook Borden & Co. v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These are two petitions brought by the petitioner in its own behalf and also in behalf of other claimants similarly situated, under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 30, § 39, against the Commonwealth, certain named respondents doing business as Testa and Scurto Engineering Company of Boston in the county of Suffolk in said Commonwealth, and Consolidated Indemnity and Insurance Company, a corporation duly established and having a place of business in Boston in the county of Suffolk in said Commonwealth. The petitions were referred to a master. The master in each case, after hearing, settled his report,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nash v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Cox v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- James v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Farrow v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Turner v. St. JohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- IerardiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Pineland Lumber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Bell & Zajicek, Inc. v. Heyward-Robinson Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1962
- Mario Pandolf Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.