Tognazzini v. San Luis Coastal Unified Sch. Dist.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
By statute, the state has mandated that all noncertificated school district employees be fingerprinted. (Ed. Code, § 45125.) In conformity with the mandate, the school district tells its employee to comply. But it is the employee who decides when and where to be printed. She elects to do so on a day off. Immediately after being printed, she collides with a motorcycle. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the jury’s finding that she was not acting within the scope of her employment.
*1056Ryon Alan Tognazzini appeals from the judgment after jury trial in favor of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jeewarat v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kephart v. Genuity, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- MURRAY'S IRON WORKS, INC. v. BoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautical System Support Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.