Legal Opinion

Sunderland v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautical System Support Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 2005No. B173641PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

INTRODUCTION

In this appeal we discuss the differing purposes of the workers’ compensation law and the respondeat superior doctrine of vicarious employer liability. We hold that the “commercial traveler rule” of workers’ compensation law may not be incorporated into the respondeat superior doctrine.

In workers’ compensation law, a worker is covered, without regard to fault, if the activity which injures the employee arises “out of and in the course of the employment.” The commercial traveler rule provides that during the period an employee travels on the employer’s business,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jeewarat v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Miller v. American Greetings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Fields v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Lynn v. Tatitlek Support Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Cameron Dyess v. Estate of Jajuan Lee MortonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API