Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Heupel
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided October 30, 1989No. Miscellaneous Dkt. No. 89-04PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
FORAY, Senior Judge:
Petitioner asks this Court to grant his petition for an extraordinary writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent military judge to dismiss all charges against him because his right to a speedy trial has been violated.1
FACTS
On 20 October 1988, petitioner, assigned to a unit located at Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, was in an authorized leave status in the Republic of the Philippines (RP). On that date he was apprehended by agents of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations as a suspect in a number of drug related offenses. Also on that day,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. ThwingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- Webb v. United StatesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- Pascascio v. FischerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- Evans v. KilroyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. CallinanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.