Legal Opinion

Hall v. Thwing

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 1, 1990No. ACMR Misc. 8903753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GILLEY, Judge:

The petitioner prays for this court to order dismissal of the charges against him because the respondent military judge failed to dismiss the charges even though the government did not meet the requirements of Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial 707 [hereinafter R.C.M.] to assure him a speedy trial. Granting this petition is an extraordinary action in the nature of a *584mandamus, since the petition arises from the respondent’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to dismiss the charges on the same grounds urged to us.

On 18 March…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. LabellaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. LonghoferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. CaputoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porter v. EggersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. YoungbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. Pascascio v. FischerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. Evans v. KilroyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. Sands v. ColbyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API