Legal Opinion

United States v. Callinan

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 8, 1991No. Misc. Dkt. No. 90A-06PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MURDOCK, Senior Judge:

This is an appeal by the government under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862. At the first session of his court-martial, Senior Airman Marks moved for dismissal of all charges based on a denial of speedy trial, citing R.C.M. 707. The military judge granted the motion and the government appealed. We hold that the military judge erred and grant the government appeal.

As usual with appeals based on speedy trial issues, we must set out a rather detailed chronology:

17 Dec 88—

3 Jan 90 Alleged offenses occurred

5 Feb 90 Marks verbally restricted to base by base…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BrittonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. MicklaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. Andrews v. HeupelU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BoladoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. HayesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. RuffinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API