Legal Opinion

Murray v. Fox

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1974No. 44288PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Ronald Thomas Murray instituted this medical malpractice action against Dr. LeRoy J. Fox by service of the summons and complaint on January 18, 1972, claiming that surgery performed upon him by defendant on May 15, 1969, was negligently performed and was not reasonably necessary. The trial court, at the conclusion of the testimony, granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and dismissal of plaintiff’s action on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations had run. The only issue raised by plaintiff’s appeal is whether the trial court correctly ruled that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Schmitt v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Swang v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Ishler v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Fabio v. BellomoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API