Legal Opinion

Ishler v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1978No. 78-125PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

I

In his first proposition of law, appellant would have this court adopt a discovery rule with respect to the time within which a patient must file his malpractice claim, and hold that where a patient determines in his own mind that malpractice has been committed against him and consults lawyers to prosecute his claim, the statute of limitations begins to run at the time he determines he has a claim, although the physician-patient relationship may continue. See, e. g., Ehlen v. Burrows (1942), 51 Cal. App. 2d 141, 124 P. 2d 82; Annotation, 80 A. L. R. 2d 368, 383-384, Section 6[c]. Appellant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Alexander v. Mt. Carmel Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Fitzmaurice v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Richard v. StaehleOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Larry C. Flynt Hustler Magazine, Inc. L.F.P., Inc. v. Brownfield, Bowen & Bally C.W. Brownfield Laurence E. Sturtz v. David L. Kahn, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Wells v. Miami Valley HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API