Legal Opinion

Hey, Recr. v. Cummer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1950No. 21404PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HURD, J:

This action in equity to declare a trust ex maleficio for accounting and equitable relief, is here on appeal on questions of law from a judgment rendered by the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County, in favor of plaintiff-appellee in the total sum of $510,318.05 with interest at six percent from December 29, 1948. The judgment is made up of two principal items, viz., the sum of $150,000.00 with interest at six percent from September 5, 1925, to the date of the judgment, and the sum of $70,303.23, found by the trial court to be secret commissions and profits collected by the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Murray v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Little v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Connelly v. BalkwillDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  2. Bessman v. BessmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Norte & Company v. HuffinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  4. Roberto v. Brown County General HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Norte & Company v. HuffinesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API