Legal Opinion
Cornelius v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1996No. 96-CV-589 (LEK) (DRH)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HOMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Edward J. Cornelius commenced this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51 et seq., alleging that he suffered a repetitive motion injury while employed as a laborer by defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail). Cornelius submitted interrogatories to Conrail seeking information on prior claims and lawsuits filed against Conrail involving similar allegations. Conrail objected to producing that information on the grounds of relevance and work product. Presently pending is Cornelius’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Betty U. Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Diamond State Insurance v. Rebel Oil Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Coker v. Duke & Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- National Congress for Puerto Rican Rights v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Breon v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Loeffler Ex Rel. Krukowski v. Lanser (In Re ANR Advance Transportation Co.)District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.