Legal Opinion
Breon v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 4, 2005No. CIV. 3:04-CV-00374 (CFD)(TPS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiff brings this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq, and parallel Connecticut statutes. Pending before the court is the plaintiffs Motion to Compel [Dkt. # 29] and Motion for a Protective Order [Dkt. #30]. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs Motion to Compel [Dkt. # 29] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs Motion for a Protective Order [Dkt. # 30] is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DCP Midstream, LP v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- In re Air Crash Near Clarence CenterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Mark Anderson, Plaintiff v. Trustees of Dartmouth College, DefendantDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Anderson v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Black v. FriedrichsenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.