Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:
The question presented in this habeas corpus case is whether in a Louisiana prosecution for a first offense of operating a vehicle while intoxicated (DWI), the Sixth Amendment, as made applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, entitles the accused to a jury trial notwithstanding that the five hundred dollars fine and six months’ imprisonment maximum penalty prescribed for the infraction does not exceed that appropriate for “petty” offenses under Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 26 L.Ed.2d 437 (1970). Disagreeing with the panel’s contrary…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. HammSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- City of Bismarck v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.