Legal Opinion
United States v. Brisbane
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 2010No. Criminal Action No. 02-315(RBW). Civil Action No. 07-1506(RBW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the pro se Petition to Vacate Defendant’s Conviction Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and Memorandum and Points of Authorities in Support Thereof (“Def.’s Mem.”). The defendant, George Brisbane, alleges that his conviction and sentence for the sale of cocaine were obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective representation, and in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Also before the Court is the defendant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment/Order of 2/19/08,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- McCoy v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.