Legal Opinion

United States v. King

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 9, 2013No. Criminal No. 2003-0249PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge

Petitioner Charles King, Jr. filed an opposed motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence and judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing arguing that his trial and appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance. He also moved to have counsel appointed to represent him in pursuing the § 2255 motion. 1 Because the record of this case shows that King is entitled to no relief and the interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel, King is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing and his § 2255 and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ValdezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Lawrence v. WoodsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  3. United States v. DacyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  4. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. United States v. FairnotDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API