Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Thomas

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 16, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-0923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Reggie B. Walton, United States District Judge

The petitioner, proceeding pro se, seeks issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenges the verdicts returned against him by a jury of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia on the grounds that he received ineffective assistance of counsel both at trial and on direct appeal to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (“DCCA”). See Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habe-as Corpus By a Person in State Custody (“Pet.”) at 4, ECF No. 1. The government contends that the petition should be…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Natural Foods Inc v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 117District Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API