Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Fostoria v. King

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1950No. 32385 and 32387PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTart, J.

Case No. 32387 is an action in mandamus originating in this court and was heard on a demurrer to the petition.

So far as material to consideration of the question presented, the petition alleges that the city of Fostoria, a noncharter city, had “constructed and tor many years # * * operated and is now operating as a public utility sewers and appurtenant facilities for the collection and disposal of sanitary sewage in said city, the service of which was and is furnished by said city generally to all properties therein without discrimination, within the limits of the capacity of the system”;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vansuch v. State Ex Rel. FetchOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Holcomb, Aud. v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Schorr v. KennedyOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. Didelius v. City CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Nicholl v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Sharpe v. HittOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State ex rel. Webb v. BlissOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Taylor v. LondonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Greenberg v. LEEOregon Supreme Court · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API