Legal Opinion
Taylor v. London
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 29, 2000No. 1999-0411PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 137.] TAYLOR ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF LONDON, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Taylor v. London,
2000-Ohio-278.] Municipal corporations—Annexation—Enactment of emergency legislation accepting an application for annexation of real estate is not prohibited by R.C. 709.10 or Section 1f, Article II of the Ohio Constitution—Emergency legislation adopted by municipality not subject to referendum. 1. The enactment of emergency legislation by a municipality accepting an application for annexation of real estate is not prohibited…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. City of Fostoria v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Taylor v. City of LondonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Garverick v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State ex rel. Hummel v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Bond v. Village of Canal Winchester, 07ap-556 (3-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ogle v. Ohio Power CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- Caterpillar Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Harold Tatman & Son's Ents., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.