Legal Opinion

Vansuch v. State Ex Rel. Fetch

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1925No. 18875PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Pursuant to the provisions of an ordinance of the city of East Youngstown, duly passed as an emergency ordinance January 7, 1924, providing for the reorganization of the police department of the city, reducing the force from 16 to 12 men, thereby relieving from duty four members of the force, including two patrolmen, and reducing the pay roll of the department $5,300 per year, John Vansuch, the safety director of thft city, notified Patrolmen Colipedro and Fetch of their removal from the force in order to conform to the requirement as to the number of patrolmen for said city.

An…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Fostoria v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State, Ex Rel. Stine v. McCawOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Walsh v. Cincinnati City CouncilOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. STATE Ex HILE v. CLEVELAND (City) EtOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Durbin v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API