Legal Opinion
Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1988No. 86-1727PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Appellants challenge the amendment to the home-rule charter of the city of Cleveland on three grounds:
1. That the ballot title and summary identifying the charter amendment question for the voters on the November 6, 1984 question and issues ballot did not properly describe the substance of the proposed amendment.
2. If implemented, the amendment would conflict with and therefore breach the collective bargaining agreements between the city and the unions under R.C. 4117.10(A).
3. The council had not followed lawful procedures in passing Ordinance No. 1397-84 as an emergency measure.
*141Lastly,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. City of Fostoria v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- State, Ex Rel. v. BigelowOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Kettering v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Mills v. CowgillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Commt. for the Charter Amendment, City Trash Collection v. WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Committee for Charter Amendment v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Voters First v. Ohio Ballot BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.