Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nicholl v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1933No. 24094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer to the reply, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that such demurrer be sustained for the reason that while the ordinance in question provides for an addition to an existing public utility and not for the acquisition or construction of a public utility, and hence is subject to referendum, not under the Constitution of Ohio, Article XVIII, Section 5, but under Section 4227-1 et seq., General Code, the petition does not contain a sufficient number of signatures to require the respondent to certify the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Fostoria v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. STATE Ex SHELL, v. ABBOTT EtOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Lynn v. SuppleOhio Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API