Legal Opinion
Catellus Development Corp. v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 3, 1993No. C-91-2531 EFLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LYNCH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Catellus Development Corporation (“Catellus”) brought this suit pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 as Amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a)(2) and (3). Plaintiff seeks to recover response costs which it claims to have incurred in the investigation and remediation of its contaminated Point Isabel property in Richmond, California.
This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment by one defen dant, General Automotive, Ine.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rudolph STECKL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Catellus Development Corporation v. United States of America, Defendant-Amicus, General Automotive, Inc., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Chatham Steel Corp. v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1994
- GJ Leasing Co., Inc. v. Union Elec. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1994
- Douglas County, Neb. v. Gould, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1994