Legal Opinion
Rudolph STECKL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1983No. 82-5524PublishedCited by 241 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Rudolph Steckl appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer, Motorola, in Steckl’s action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (the ADEA). Steckl contends that the order is improper because the company’s explanation for denying him a promotion was a pretext for age discrimination rather than a legitimate business reason. He also argues summary judgment is inappropriate because it was his intention to prove pretext by attacking the motivation and intent of Motorola’s witnesses on cross-examination.
S…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wilbur L. KEPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSTITUTE OF GAS TECHNOLOGY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Frank Douglas v. Marvin Anderson, Raymond Hanson, Board of Directors, Hastings College of Law and Hastings Service Foundation, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Andrew P. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by241 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Andrew G. YARTZOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lee M. THOMAS, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.