Legal Opinion
Douglas County, Neb. v. Gould, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided December 19, 1994No. 8:CV90-00395PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STROM, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Madewell & Madewell, Inc.’s motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 948 and 1108) and plaintiff Douglas County’s motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 1130). After careful consideration of the briefs, the exhibits and the applicable law, the Court finds that defendant’s motions should be granted and plaintiffs motion denied.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Edward Hines Lumber Company v. Vulcan Materials Company, Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London v. St. Joe Minerals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997
- Pneumo Abex v. Bessemer and Lake Erie RR Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Acme Printing Ink Co. v. Menard, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Interstate Non-Ferrous Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.