Legal Opinion
Chatham Steel Corp. v. Brown
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided July 19, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-50064/LACPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF LIABILITY
COLLIER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek recovery under § 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) for costs they have incurred and will continue to incur in cleaning up the “Sapp Battery” Superfund Site near Cotton-dale, Florida. Plaintiffs Chatham Steel, Dixie Rubber & Metal and Jackson Iron & Metal are among a group of fifty-seven companies who signed a consent decree with the United States obligating them to conduct and finance the clean up of contaminated soil at the Site.…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Byron Nelson Co. v. Orchard Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Ekotek Site PRP Committee v. SelfDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
- Special Purpose Accounts Receivable Cooperative Corp. v. Prime One Capital Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2000
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Interstate Non-Ferrous Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.