Legal Opinion
Radecki v. Director of Bureau of Worker's Disability Compensation
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1994No. Docket 166784PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs in this worker’s compensation case appeal as of right from a circuit court order denying reconsideration of an order denying plaintiffs’ petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissing the case. We affirm.
The Worker’s Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.101 et seq.; MSA 17.237(101) et seq., provides at §351(1), MCL 418.351(1), MSA 17.237(351X1), for payment of a weekly benefit to an injured worker of "80% of the employee’s after-tax average weekly wage, but not more than the maximum weekly rate of compensation, as determined under section 355.” Section 313 of the act provides:(1)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doe v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Pleasant Ridge v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- MICHIGAN Ex Rel OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Michigan Humane Society v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Delly v. Bureau of State LotteryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Taylor v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Taylor v. Gate PharmaceuticalsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Baraga County v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. CarusoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- Judith H Robards v. Joyce E Kaferle MdMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.