Legal Opinion

Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. Caruso

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 8, 2008No. 1:05-cr-00128PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment to Defendant on State-Law Claim; Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on State-Law Claim

PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.

This is a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Inc. (“MPAS”) is a private non-profit entity that is statutorily authorized “to monitor facilities and programs that house individuals with mental illnesses and developmental disabilities, to investigate suspected incidents of abuse and neglect, and to pursue administrative, legal, and other…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Leavitt v. Jane L.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Henry v. Dow Chemical CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Kaye-KibbeyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  2. Griffin v. ReznickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
  3. Lakeland Regional Health System v. Walgreens Health Initiatives, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Mid-Century Insurance v. FishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API