Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Gate Pharmaceuticals

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2002No. Docket 217269, 217279, 217290, 217328, 227700PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

At issue in these consolidated products liability appeals is the constitutionality of MCL 600.2946(5), which limits the liability of drug manufacturers and sellers. In Docket Nos. 217269, 217279, 217290, and 217328, defendants American Home Products Corporation, Medeva Pharmaceutials, Inc., SmithKline Beecham Corporation, and Gate Pharmaceuticals appeal by leave granted an order of the Wayne Circuit Court that denied their motion for summary disposition predicated on MCL 600.2946(5). The court ruled that MCL 600.2946(5) was unconstitu tional because it improperly delegated to the United…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Department of Natural Resources v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Julia Garcia v. Wyeth-Ayerst LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Wayne County Board of Commissioners v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Garcia v. Wyeth-Ayerst LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API