Legal Opinion

Smiley v. Estate of Toney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1969No. 41818PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The issue in this case, which is here on leave granted to appeal from a decision of the Appellate Court, Second District (100 Ill. App. 2d 271), involves the construction of the “uninsured motorist”, provision of the Illinois Insurance Code. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1963, ch. 73, par. 755a.

The issue, arose in this way. Roy Smiley was a passenger in Byron Emanuel’s car when it was struck by a car negligently driven by Charles Toney. The plaintiffs in this action are Smiley and the administrator of Emanuel’s estate, and the primary defendant was the administrator of Toney’s estate. A jury returned a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. FuscoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  2. Taylor v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Carrignan v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  4. Smiley v. Estate of ToneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Barnes v. PowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Brake v. MFA Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API