Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Company v. Fusco

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 28, 1966No. Appeal No. 25PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is .an appeal from a judgment entered by a superior court justice pursuant to his decision that ■the uninsured automobile bodily injury benefit contained in the amendatory endorsement attached to- a policy of automobile insurance issued by the plaintiff company to the defendant’s deceased spouse is not recoverable in the circumstances established by the instant record.

It appears therefrom that on March 12, 1965, plaintiff, hereafter referred to as Allstate, delivered its “Crusader Policy,” so called, providing automobile liability coverage to Ralph C. Fusco-, then husband of defendant.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Taylor v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Hardin v. American Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  4. Barnes v. PowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Little v. Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API