Legal Opinion

Vegodsky v. City of Tucson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 5, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 26PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered for the defendant on a jury verdict in an action brought by a pedestrian alleging that the City of Tucson negligently constructed and/or maintained an area of its public streets so as to cause the plaintiff, Ruth Vegodsky, to fall and sustain personal injuries.

The area involved in the law suit was the intersection of Congress and Scott Streets in the downtown area of Tucson, Arizona. It was the plaintiffs’ contention that Mrs. Vegodsky fell in the area where the portions of these two streets carrying vehicular traffic overlapped, that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Trojanovich v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Tucker v. CollarArizona Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Braillard v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wisener v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Salinas v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API