Legal Opinion

Koppers Co. v. Asher Coal Mining Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 27, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the 'Court by

Judge Willis

Affirming.

This appeal involves the interpretation of certain covenants in a mining lease held by the Koppers Company on lands of the Asher Coal Mining Company. The lease covers two distinctly described boundaries of coal lands, but is a single contract, with the exception of the covenants respecting rentals and royalties, and the descriptions of the leased lands. All the other covenants and conditions in the contract apply equally to both tracts embraced within the lease.

The controversy came up in this way: The Koppers Company ceased operations on one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank of Antigo v. Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. O'Bryan v. Mengel CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Gilmore & Co. v. Samuels & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Dorsey v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bullock v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. United States Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Business Men's Assur. Co. of America v. EadesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Hawkins & Chamberlain v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Louisville Metro. Sewer v. T+C ContractingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API