Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Young

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 12, 1933PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

For many years prior to 1925, H. E. Bullock and T. L. Young' were associated in the operation of several coal companies, both producing and selling, controlling them for the profits of co-operative control of both ends of the industry. Two or three of the corporations were engaged exclusively in marketing coal and for that reason Bullock and Young were anxious for the control of the Carrs Fork Coal Company which owned and operated certain mines in Eastern Kentucky. To secure the control of it, it was necessary that they buy approximately 200…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Harrison v. TalbotCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  2. Castleman-Blakemore Co. v. Pickrell & Craig Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Challinor v. AxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Honaker v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Henry T. Merritt, Doing Business as Coffee Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Davis v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
  3. Bond Bros. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  4. Mills v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Vinaird v. Bodkin's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API