Legal Opinion

Rainsbarger v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1940No. 44962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

The facts are stipulated and mostly undisputed. Virgil Rainsbarger, appearing by his next friend and who for convenience will be referred to as plaintiff, and who was aged eighteen, on August 24, 1937, signed application for a policy of accident insurance and delivered it to John DeBoer, agent of the defendant company. The application was sent by the agent to W. H. Hoover, agency manager of the defendant at Waterloo, September 4, 1937, but the premium which had been paid to DeBoer was not received by Hoover until September 14, 1937. Policy was issued September 17, mailed to DeBoer for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Mickel v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Wilson v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Chambers v. Home Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Rogers v. Equitable Mutual Life & Endowment Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Linnastruth v. Mut. Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Quinn v. Mutual Benefit Health & Acc. Ass'n of OmahaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Linnastruth v. Mut. Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API