Legal Opinion

Linnastruth v. Mut. Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1943No. L. A. 18502Published

1Opinion of the Court

22 Cal.2d 216 (1943)

BELLE LINNASTRUTH, Appellant,

v.

MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASSOCIATION (a Corporation), Respondent.

L. A. No. 18502.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 17, 1943.

Lyle W. Rucker for Appellant.

J. Edward Haley and De Lancey C. Smith for Respondent.

Horace T. Beverly and Keesling, Smith & Wayland, as Amici Curiae, on behalf of Respondent.

SHENK, J.

The plaintiff as beneficiary sued on contracts of accident insurance issued to her husband Frank Linnastruth. The trial court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed. The facts are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Perkins v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API