Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Spring Valley Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1924No. Civ. No. 4885PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff

from a judgment against him entered after a demurrer had been sustained to his complaint, without leave to amend. The complaint alleged that on March 8, 1923, the defendant Spring Valley Water Company owned and maintained a large and deep body of water contained in a large artificial reservoir in the immediate vicinity of Holly Park, in the city and county of San Francisco, California; that the said reservoir and the sides and embankments thereof were at all of said times visible to passers-by in the street immediately surrounding same and said reservoir is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. King v. LennenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ward v. Oakley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Bass v. Quinn-Robbins Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Betts v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API