Reardon v. Spring Valley Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff
from a judgment against him entered after a demurrer had been sustained to his complaint, without leave to amend. The complaint alleged that on March 8, 1923, the defendant Spring Valley Water Company owned and maintained a large and deep body of water contained in a large artificial reservoir in the immediate vicinity of Holly Park, in the city and county of San Francisco, California; that the said reservoir and the sides and embankments thereof were at all of said times visible to passers-by in the street immediately surrounding same and said reservoir is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- King v. LennenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Ward v. Oakley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bass v. Quinn-Robbins Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Betts v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.