Legal Opinion

Falk v. Amsberry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 31, 1981No. 74-5251, CA 14025PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Third party defendant (Larsen) appeals from a judgment entered against him and in favor of third party plaintiffs (Amsberry) in this action for indemnity. For several years plaintiffs in the original action (Falk) leased farmland from Larsen to grow grass seed. It was an oral lease with cash rent to be paid at the end of each crop year on October 1. The lease was to terminate if Larsen sold the land.

In August, 1972, Amsberry began to negotiate with Larsen to purchase the land, and a contract of sale was executed on November 15, 1972. Prior to the sale and during the negotiations, Falk…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Interior Warehouse Co. v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Estep v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. King v. TalcottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Chaney v. HaederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Hawkins v. City of La GrandeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Grogan v. Harvest Capital Co. (In re Grogan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  5. Taggart v. BattagliaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API