Chaney v. Haeder
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This action involves the question whether, under a statutory warranty deed, a grantor is liable to a grantee for costs and attorney fees incurred in defending against an unsuccessful claim of adverse possession. ORS 93.850(2)(c)(C). We hold that, under the facts of this case, there is no liability. Accordingly, we affirm.
In 1982, defendants Haeder purchased property from defendant Dittenhofer (defendant), who conveyed by a statutory warranty deed. The property was described:
“Lot 7, Block B, Subdivision of Lots 2,6,7 and 9, in Tract D of SMITH’S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF PORTLAND, in the City of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estep v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Leach v. GunnarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Balte v. BedemillerOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Ellis v. AbbottOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- King v. TalcottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Omega Chemical Co., Inc. v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Stevenson v. EcklundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Freeborn v. Dow/Western Title and Escrow Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022