Legal Opinion

Taggart v. Battaglia

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 1996No. 94P1104; CA A89233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In this action for timber trespass, plaintiffs appeal from the partial summary judgment, ORCP 67 B, entered in favor of defendant. Because we conclude that defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, ORCP 47 C, we reverse and remand.

The property that is the subject of this dispute was owned by Hilda Caspar, who died before the occurrence of the events that led to this action. On January 14, 1981, Caspar leased the property to defendant’s predecessors in interest “for agricultural purposes only, including the planting, growing and harvesting of Christmas trees thereon.” The lease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Francis Bros. v. SchallbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hostetler v. EcclesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Tallman v. HavillOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Falk v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tualatin Valley Housing Partners v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API