Legal Opinion
People v. Kanwal
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 24, 2014No. Supreme Court Case No. 13SA60PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
1 1 The People petitioned for relief pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.1(d) and C.A.R. 21 from an order of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction a claim of attorney misconduct. The PDJ concluded that the People were not *495authorized to plead, and the Hearing Board lacked jurisdiction to consider, any claim for the filing of which the Attorney Regulation Committee had not given specific approval. Because it was undisputed that the Committee had not specifically approved the filing of a claim for the violation of Rule 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- In Re FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Colorado Supreme Court Grievance Committee v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. SusmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyer v. Health Grades, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- In re Chessin v. Office of Attorney Regulation CounselSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. George P. Stanton, IIIWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Suthers v. Johnson Law Group, PLLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Calvert v. MayberrySupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.