Legal Opinion
People v. Susman
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 13, 1978No. 27887PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
The Attorney General filed a formal complaint against the respondent, Stephen T. Susman, alleging that he engaged in conduct which violated Rule 241(B), C.R.C.P. The two counts in the complaint charged violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and asserted that the respondent had neglected legal matters entrusted to him. DR6-101 (A)(3).
As a result of the hearing on the complaint, additional charges were before the Grievance Committee of this court relating to a violation of DR1-102(A), which provides, in pertinent part, that a lawyer shall not:
“(3) . . . engage in illegal conduct…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EspedalWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Gassman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Razatos v. Colorado Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Colorado Supreme Court Grievance Committee v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. BergeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. CraigWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.