Daniels v. Daniels
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
It appears from the complaint herein that on the fifth day of June, 1897, at Chicago, Illinois, Newell Daniels and Sarah L. Daniels made and executed their promissory note for $1,000 without interest, payable to Walter A. Daniels at his office in Chicago upon demand, and at the same time and place made and executed a similar note for a like amount to Adelaide M. and Cora Jean Daniels. That at the time the said notes were so made and executed, and as a part of the same transaction, the payors, who were described as residents of the state of California, as parties of the first part, the payees,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- McDonald v. HuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- State Loan & Trust Co. v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement Department of Industrial Relations v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- In re DowneyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939