Legal Opinion

Clendaniel v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1941No. S. F. 16474PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission refusing to reopen its decision denying compensation to the petitioner.

The petitioner was a waiter employed at the Horseshoe Tavern in San Francisco. He worked on the night shift, commencing at 8 o’clock. He suffered a slight puncture or laceration of the thumb, which developed into blood poisoning. He claimed to have sustained the injury on the night of March 31, 1937, by striking his thumb on the end of a protruding nail while washing the top shelf of the salad counter in the tavern. He was confined in a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Nielsen v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Nicky Blair's Restaurant v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Temple v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. Aliano v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API