Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Rittenhouse

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1955No. 36099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment for attorney’s fees in favor of the movants, Irving H. Green, Rittenhouse, Hanson & Evans, Walter D. Hanson and S. G. Evans, against Chicago, Rock Island, and Pacific Railroad Company, defendant. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The movants were attorneys for one-John Tollie Smith in the prosecution of an action for damages for personal injuries against said railroad company, as defendant. On September 12, 1952, after trial, verdict, and ordered remittitur, judgment was rendered in favor of said Smith, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Simpson v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Wood v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Cherry v. Erwin & ErwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Aleman v. AnnableSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tisdale v. Wheeler Bros. Grain Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Stubblefield v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Mehdipour v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. Hough v. HoughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Hough v. HoughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API