Hough v. Hough
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Dissent
OPALA, V.C.J.,
dissenting in part.
T1 The court reverses today the trial court's counsel-fee award to the special master and denies his appeal-related attorney's fee quest. I agree with the court's pronouncement insofar as it rejects the notion that the provisions of 48 0.S8.2001 § 110(D) are invocable here to support the special master's claim for a counsel-fee award. I disagree that the fee award is not sustainable by another legislative source. The provisions of 12 0.8.2001 § 9861 authorize an allowance of attorney's fee in an action to recover "for services." A special master's claim for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Daily v. ZurcherDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
- The Stanford Daily v. James Zurcher, Individually and as Chief of Police of the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.