Legal Opinion

Tisdale v. Wheeler Bros. Grain Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1979No. 53273PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice:

This appeal is sought to be prosecuted by three (3) lawyers who deem themselves aggrieved by the trial judge’s order, in a post-judgment ancillary proceeding, by which they were allowed, in counsel fees for representing two minor plaintiffs, substantially less than the percentage of total recovery fixed by their agreement with the minors’ mother as the children’s “next friend and natural guardian”. Our consideration on the motion to dismiss is confined to three narrow questions of law: (1) Does a lawyer have standing to appeal, with or without the consent of his client, from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conrad v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Ogle v. OgleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Opperud v. BusseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Lambert v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Simpson v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Abel v. TisdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. New Life Pentecostal Church of JenksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Kahre v. KahreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API