Legal Opinion

Hough v. Hough

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 2004No. 96,862Published

1Opinion of the Court

92 P.3d 695 (2004)

2004 OK 45

Charles H. HOUGH, Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

Ashley H. HOUGH, Defendant/Appellee.

No. 96,862.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 8, 2004.

LAVENDER, J.

¶ 1 The issue in the present cause is whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining that its order requiring Husband to pay the fees and costs of the special master and the order awarding a judicial lien to special master to secure such payment, were intended to provide support for the wife and thus, non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in making such…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Daily v. ZurcherDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API