Legal Opinion
State v. Whitchurch
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 25, 1990No. 89-035PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendant, Gregory Whitchurch, appeals from denial of his motion by the trial court to strike one of his probation conditions. We affirm.
On May 29, 1986 defendant was charged with lewd and lascivious conduct in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2601. He entered a plea of nolo contendere and, pursuant to a plea agreement, consented to a suspended sentence of four to five years imprisonment. The terms of probation were included in the agreement and included the following conditions:
#21. You shall not reside with your children nor contact your children in any manner unless approved by the probation…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- State v. BubarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. CredeurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Commonwealth v. LapointeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- State v. Billy Joe PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.